|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
GMU Law Holds its Ground on Free Speechby Ann Snyder • Oct 4, 2011 at 2:03 pm https://www.legal-project.org/blog/2011/10/gmu-law-holds-its-ground-on-free-speech At a time when many educational institutions have succumbed to mildewing political correctness and cower in the face of pressure to censor controversial speech, at least one school still maintains free and open debate on campus. That school is George Mason University School of Law. We applaud the school and its dean for their unequivocal and brave stance. "GMU should be proud that the dean of its law school has issued such a strong statement defending freedom of expression," said Adam Kissel of The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education. The trouble started when certain people learned that the law school's Federalist Society and Jewish Law Students Association were hosting a lecture by Nonie Darwish. Darwish is Director of Former Muslims United and author of Now They Call Me Infidel: Why I Renounced Jihad for America, Israel, and the War on Terror and Cruel and Usual Punishment: The Terrifying Global Implications of Islamic Law. She is no stranger to controversy. Darwish's scheduled lecture, "The West's Clash with Radicalism," predictably drew criticism, including some from the usual suspects. In a September 30th press release, the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) called on the GMU School of Law to "disinvite" Darwish, referring to her as "a notorious Islamophobe." In the same press release, CAIR described itself as a "Muslim civil liberties and advocacy organization," and claimed "[i]ts mission is to enhance the understanding of Islam, encourage dialogue, protect civil liberties…" Evidently, CAIR's idea of how to "encourage dialogue" and "protect civil liberties" is to silence speech it doesn't like. Likewise, CAIR's notion of how "to enhance the understanding of Islam" is to shut down speakers who see Islam differently than it does. CAIR's posturing as a civil liberties organization, while seeking to restrict free expression about Islam on campus, drips with irony. To its credit, GMU School of Law did not bend. In an email intended to "clarify the policy" of the law school on speakers, Dean Daniel Polsby took just the right position on freedom of speech on campus. (His statement can and should be read in its entirety here.) He concluded:
With similar clarity of conviction and commitment to principle, Ashley Finnegan, President of GMU School of Law's Federalist Society, stated:
The show, as they say, will go on this Wednesday evening. The Legal Project commends Dean Polsby and the law school administration for their clear, pro-free speech stance and their preservation of free and open debate on campus. We encourage them to remain steadfast in their resolve. Related Topics: Pressure Tactics Against Free Speech, Willful Blindness & PC Problems receive the latest by email: subscribe to the legal project's free mailing list This text may be reposted or forwarded so long as it is presented as an integral whole with complete and accurate information provided about its author, date, place of publication, and original URL. |
Geert Wilders Lauds Legal Project "Last June, I was acquitted of all charges by an Amsterdam court. The Middle East Forum's Legal Project ... was always there to help, advise and assist ... The importance of the MEF's Legal Project in reclaiming free expression and political discourse ... cannot be overestimated." — Geert Wilders, September 29, 2011 Latest Blog Posts
News
Recent Articles Latest LP in the Media Most Viewed |
||||||||||
© 2024 The Middle East Forum. |