|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Unaccountable Speech Czars and Their Civility Codes
by Karen Lugo https://www.legal-project.org/1233/unaccountable-speech-czars-and-their-civility Excerpt: If you thought that the Supreme Court was the final arbiter of free speech, think again. Although the highest court has just affirmed in an 8-1 ruling that speech touching areas of public concern deserves the highest level of protection in furtherance of public debate, local speech police are still busily imposing victim-defined civility codes. There may be no criminal punishment that accompanies a censure from these speech-minders but there certainly is a heaping dose of public approbation and foreseeable damage to reputation and professional standing. Especially when the executive director of the government-appointed commission gratuitously comments for publication that there is an implicit link between your speech – and an ostensible hate crime. An assumption based upon an assumption affords a public official the authority to speculate that you have motivated a hate crime? This kind of unbridled and arbitrary power is chilling and certainly not consistent with the Supreme Court's recent vindication of "free and robust debate of public issues." Read the complete original version of this item... receive the latest by email: subscribe to the legal project's free mailing list Note: The content of external articles does not necessarily reflect the views of The Legal Project. |
Geert Wilders Lauds Legal Project "Last June, I was acquitted of all charges by an Amsterdam court. The Middle East Forum's Legal Project ... was always there to help, advise and assist ... The importance of the MEF's Legal Project in reclaiming free expression and political discourse ... cannot be overestimated." — Geert Wilders, September 29, 2011 |