|
"[Those] who won our independence believed ... the path of safety lies in the opportunity to discuss freely supposed grievances and proposed remedies." — Justice Brandeis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: The OIC vs. Freedom of Expression
by Nina Shea
National Review Online
April 13, 2011
https://www.legal-project.org/1318/re-the-oic-vs-freedom-of-expression
Excerpt:
Jacob Mchangama is right to sound the alarm about the U.N.'s shift of focus away from attempting to make "defamation of religions" a human-rights violation and toward banning hate speech. But hate-speech bans are not new. Religious-hate-speech laws have long been used as proxies for Islamic blasphemy rules in the member states of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC), and increasingly in Europe, Canada, and Australia as well. The U.S. does not have hate-speech laws. However, Mchangama rightly suggests that, with the death of the "defamation of religions" resolutions, we will be seeing a big international push to criminalize religious hate speech, including here in the U.S. As we gird for battle, here are some points to consider.
|
Read the complete original version of this item...
receive the latest by email: subscribe to the legal project's free mailing list
Note: The content of external articles does not necessarily reflect the views of The Legal Project.
|
Geert Wilders Lauds Legal Project
"Last June, I was acquitted of all charges by an Amsterdam court. The Middle East Forum's Legal Project ... was always there to help, advise and assist ... The importance of the MEF's Legal Project in reclaiming free expression and political discourse ... cannot be overestimated."
— Geert Wilders, September 29, 2011
Read the full text of Wilders' statement
|